Background Over time, I encountered many different challenges across the financial data world. Although they often appeared to be separate problems, I increasingly found that many could be traced back to the same root cause: financial meaning was fragmented across systems, documents, models, mappings, rules and people. Financial institutions already hold enormous amounts of data … Continue reading AI-Native Financial Data Foundation (38): The Belief, Aim, Principles and Products Behind My Finsight Initiative
AI-Native Financial Data Foundation (37): Finsight Semantic Repository: Extensible by Design
Financial semantics are never finished. Products evolve. Industry standards release new versions. Institutions replace applications, redesign data platforms and introduce new controls. New analytical and AI workflows also require additional context that may not have been anticipated when the original models were created. The challenge is therefore not simply to define financial meaning once. It … Continue reading AI-Native Financial Data Foundation (37): Finsight Semantic Repository: Extensible by Design
AI-Native Financial Data Foundation (36) — Five Ontology Elements Applied in Financial Services
In the previous blog post, we introduced the four semantic layers of the Finsight Semantic Foundation: the Business, Canonical, Physical and Mapping Layers. Together, these layers organise financial meaning across business concepts, industry-aligned models, real-world systems and the mappings that connect them. But defining the layers is only the beginning. We also need a consistent … Continue reading AI-Native Financial Data Foundation (36) — Five Ontology Elements Applied in Financial Services
AI-Native Financial Data Foundation (35): From Business Meaning to Physical Data — The Four Semantic Layers
In the previous article, I introduced the high-level overview of the Finsight Semantic Foundation. The foundation consists of two main parts: the Semantic Model and the Semantic Repositories. This article focuses on the first component: the Finsight Semantic Model. The model is organised into four connected layers: the Business Layer, the Canonical Layer, the Physical … Continue reading AI-Native Financial Data Foundation (35): From Business Meaning to Physical Data — The Four Semantic Layers
AI-Native Financial Data Foundation (34) – Overview of the Finsight Semantic Foundation
In the previous article, I discussed several characteristics of financial services that need to be reflected in ontology modelling, particularly in capital markets and FICC. Financial products are contractual and compositional. Trades evolve through lifecycle events and changing states. Meaning depends on roles, context, provenance and time. The same business object may also appear in … Continue reading AI-Native Financial Data Foundation (34) – Overview of the Finsight Semantic Foundation
AI-Native Financial Data Foundation (33) – Ontology Modelling Challenges in Financial Services
Across the previous 30+ articles in this series, I have focused on the theoretical foundations behind AI-native financial data platforms, covering financial business semantics, canonical data models, knowledge graphs, GraphRAG, semantic retrieval, tool contracts and related topics. From this article onwards, I would like to shift the discussion towards the design and implementation of my … Continue reading AI-Native Financial Data Foundation (33) – Ontology Modelling Challenges in Financial Services
AI-Native Financial Data Foundation (32) – MCP: A Standard Interface for Agentic Financial Data
In the previous article, I discussed the idea of tool contracts. The core idea was simple: an AI agent should not have vague, unconstrained access to financial data systems. It should interact with those systems through explicit capabilities. Each capability should have a clear purpose, input structure, output structure, evidence expectation, and policy boundary. For … Continue reading AI-Native Financial Data Foundation (32) – MCP: A Standard Interface for Agentic Financial Data
AI-Native Financial Data Foundation (31) – Tool Contracts: Making Agent Capabilities Explicit
In the previous article, I explored a retrieval pattern for the financial semantic layer. The pattern is: user question → classify intent and extract context → scoped hybrid candidate search → entity resolution → constrained graph traversal → governed evidence → LLM explanation For governed financial semantic questions, the LLM should not freely inspect the … Continue reading AI-Native Financial Data Foundation (31) – Tool Contracts: Making Agent Capabilities Explicit
AI-Native Financial Data Foundation (30): Exploring a Retrieval Pattern for the Financial Semantic Layer
In the previous article, I raised a practical question: what should happen when a user does not use the exact field name, semantic concept, or use-case name stored in the graph? A user may ask: "Do we have the fixed coupon needed for valuation?". However, the graph may use governed names such as "FixedRate". The … Continue reading AI-Native Financial Data Foundation (30): Exploring a Retrieval Pattern for the Financial Semantic Layer
AI-Native Financial Data Foundation (29) – Cypher by Example: Querying a Financial Semantic Graph
In the previous article, I looked at Neo4j as a candidate technology for modelling semantic relationships as a graph. The key idea was simple: a financial semantic model is not only a list of terms. It is a network of connected meaning. A source field may map to a semantic concept. The concept may belong … Continue reading AI-Native Financial Data Foundation (29) – Cypher by Example: Querying a Financial Semantic Graph







You must be logged in to post a comment.